Socialmediatoday.com Member

Stalk Me

63 Event Sales & Marketing Tips

63 Sales and Marketing tips for trade shows

Get  the slides and recording for #63Tips for before, during, and after your next event to maximize your ROI.

Subscribe for 'first-to-know' advantage.

Your email:

The Smarketing Story

Listen to MiM CEO Carole Mahoney on Mind Your Own Business Radio talk about why smarketing, why now, and what we have to look forward to.

Listen Now

Read the Mainebiz article that sparked the Smarketing Dating Revolution.

Read Now

Business Book Reviews: My Take

Tuesday, Nov 19, 2013 Carole Mahoney
One man's work is another man's party. The topic of discussion from last week's live Inbound Networker's group...Read More
Monday, Aug 12, 2013 Carole Mahoney
How Big Brands and Small Business Can Prosper in a Connected Economy Why I read it: Despite the fact that the...Read More
Sunday, Apr 28, 2013 Carole Mahoney
How inbound marketing has turned sales upside down making it more difficult and more lucrative at the same time. ...Read More

Browse by Sales and Marketing Topics

A sales and marketing blog from one entrepreneur to another.

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

What are Lead Generation Experts Saying Behind the Scenes?

  
  
  
  

Dale Berkebile, CEO of Brandwise, is the Yin to my Yang (or vice-versa?). More importantly, he is also one of the Smarketing Partner Companies that is a sponsor of the 2012 sales and marketing integration course.

The following post is actually Dale's response to Rick Roberge, the Smarketing RainMaker who is also a sponsor of #smarketing2012, after he drew a line in the sand and asked other inbound marketing agencies:

sales marketing integration trendTwo posts - who's right? This one? or this one?

What Rick was really asking is which is more important? Hire a sales person or marketing agency? 

***DISCLAIMER*** the first post is mine. The second post is another agency. Rick posted this of his own free will- I saw it at the same time as everyone else. He tends to do that. The point is, this isn't some planned campaign aimed to manipulate or humilate anyone. It is simply a warning shout to sales, marketing and business owners.

I'm more interested in what you, the reader thinks. Place your vote here. 

Leads are useless without a sales person working them.

A top notch sales person should be able to prospect and fill their pipeline with or without the inbound leads. If you are relying 100% on inbound leads maybe your sales person needs to be replaced. Having a system that creates inbound leads is awesome if they are generating qualified leads.

Five experts for the price of one is questionable. Most inbound agencies charge $30-$90K annually. According to PayScale.com a sales rep may make $30-$120K. Similar expense, but doing inbound with weak sales closes very little business. Doing sales with weak inbound should still close decent number of deals.

Qualified leads, every time will depend on how a "qualified" is defined.  Does qualified mean someone raised their hand by filling out a form? Or does qualified mean a perfect fit for your organization's buyer persona that is going to not only be easy to close, but also turn into an evangelist that continues to work with you and brings you new business for years by spreading the word? If the second is what you classified as "qualified" then there is no way that every lead is qualified, heck most companies doing inbound would be lucky if 10% of their leads were "qualified".

No lead left behind. Yes, it is true Hubspot's lead nurturing campaign's are pretty cool and effective when used properly. They are not going to close deals though. This is why the lead nurturing and sales team need to work in tandem. By nurturing your leads the sales team will have more time to work the A leads first and then move on to the B and C leads later.

Reduced cost per lead. There is a ton of data on this, just ask Hubspot. I will tell you this though; a team of good sales people will make more money then a team of good inbound marketers. I know many Hubspot partners that do not come close to what a sales company like Kurlan, RainGroup, The Sales Board or other sales companies make. So cost of lead is one thing, but what is the difference in annual revenue? If it cost $373 per lead for outbound dominated (no mention of sales in this one, hmmm interesting) but the outbound generates $500K to $5 mill per client and the inbound cost per lead is $143 but only generates $30K to $90K… which is a better solution?

Perspective from an experienced inbound marketer.

I have been in the marketing world for the last 18+ years, running my own firm for the last 13 and a certified hubspot partner for nearly 3 years. The point is this when we did inbound alone and we had ok results. When we got serious with sales we tripled our business. We needed the sale portion to make things work. I see so many Hubspot people struggling and/or doing just ok. If they had a powerful sales background to match the powerful inbound background, then things would start kicking into overdrive. Aligning sales with marketing is the real solution. If you are not familiar with Smarketing yet, I would start looking into it.

This is where Carole's article is heading. Hubspot knows the power of customer loyalty, this is why they created CHI. They don't want customers to churn because they know it is a lot more expensive to 'purchase' a new customer then keeping a current customer happy. Ask any company why they have the size sales force they have. How soon did they start hiring sales people? Was it early in the game or several years in? By no means am I knocking inbound or Hubspot, but I am just sharing the facts as I see them. Please share some thoughts if you agree or disagree.

And that is all he wrote. ~E

Wikipedia Photo credit 

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Search for a topic on the blog here.

Loading
(results appear in a separate window)